Legal Opinion

Hogeboom v. Hurlburt

New York Family Court

Decided June 9, 1955PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.

The complainant’s undisputed and uncorroborated testimony is to the effect that she became acquainted with the defendant in August of 1953, and began keeping company with him sometime after January 13, 1954; that within a reasonable time after the latter date she began having sexual intercourse with him and continued to do so frequently thereafter ; that they occupied the same room in the home of one Rex Hurlburt at Quinneyville for a certain period of time and later *998had an apartment on Highland Avenue in the city of Binghamton which was Occupied by herself and the defendant, Robert Hurlburt,…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pyeatte v. PyeatteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  2. In re Saratoga County Commissioner of Public WelfareNew York Family Court · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API