Legal Opinion

Shute v. Exeter Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided December 5, 1897PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWallace, J.

One of the questions was whether the breaking of the pulley which injured the deceased was caused by the defendants’ negligence. In order to sustain his action, it was necessary for the plaintiff to prove that it was. The evidence that the first pulley, which was “ of the same form of construction and material, and used for the same purpose and in the same way” as the last one, broke a short time before the accident; that both pulleys were driven by a tight belt; and that the tightness of the belt and the danger of its breaking the shaft or pulley were called to the attention of the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Haseltine v. Concord RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1888
  2. Smith v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1884

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Galvin v. Brown & McCabeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Story v. Concord & Montreal RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1900
  3. Batchelder v. Manchester Street RailwaySupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1903
  4. Beach v. HuntsmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1908
  5. Lynch v. L. B. Sprague, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API