Legal Opinion
Tweed v. Buckner
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
Decided September 28, 1944No. 192PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RICHARDSON, Chief Judge.
Suit was brought by appellant Tweed, a real estate broker, claiming a commission for services in procuring a purchaser for appellees’ property. Trial was by the court which made a general finding for defendant. Judgment was entered pursuant thereto and this .appeal resulted.
Confining ourselves to facts which are undisputed, the following appears:
Appellees employed Tweed to find a purchaser for certain residential property, owned and occupied by them. After showing the property to prospective purchasers, Tweed submitted a proposed contract executed by a Dr. Kossow. The…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Kessler v. EldredSupreme Court of the United States · 1907
- Hoffman v. Ætna Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Canal Co. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Dotson v. MillikenSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Morrison v. MiotonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1927
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Buckner v. TweedDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1945
- Shaffer v. BergerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1951
- Heyward v. KirschDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1950
- Long v. MurchisonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1948
- Rifkind v. TurnerDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1947
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.