James v. Churchill Downs, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
GUDGEL, Judge.
This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted by the Jefferson Circuit Court. The court adjudged that appellee, Churchill Downs, Inc., possessed, and validly exercised a common law right to exclude appellants from its racetrack on the basis that they are undesirable patrons. Appellants’ principal contention is that the legislature abrogated appellee’s common law right of exclusion when it vested the Kentucky State Racing Commission with the same right by enacting KRS 230.215 and KRS 230.260. We disagree with this contention and affirm.
Appellants filed this action after they…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Rodic v. Thistledown Racing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
- Spirko v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
- Capital Theatre Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
3Cited by13 opinions
- Silbert v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- Towers Tenant Ass'n, Inc. v. Towers Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
- Eric Brooks, Jeffrey Yass and Kenneth Brodie v. Chicago Downs Association, Inc., D/B/A Sportsman's ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- PNGI Charles Town Gaming, LLC v. ReynoldsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
- Donovan v. Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.