Legal Opinion

James v. Churchill Downs, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Kentucky

Decided August 14, 1981PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUDGEL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment granted by the Jefferson Circuit Court. The court adjudged that appellee, Churchill Downs, Inc., possessed, and validly exercised a common law right to exclude appellants from its racetrack on the basis that they are undesirable patrons. Appellants’ principal contention is that the legislature abrogated appellee’s common law right of exclusion when it vested the Kentucky State Racing Commission with the same right by enacting KRS 230.215 and KRS 230.260. We disagree with this contention and affirm.

Appellants filed this action after they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Rodic v. Thistledown Racing Club, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1980
  2. Spirko v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1972
  3. Capital Theatre Co. v. ComptonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Silbert v. RamseyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  2. Towers Tenant Ass'n, Inc. v. Towers Ltd. PartnershipDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 1983
  3. Eric Brooks, Jeffrey Yass and Kenneth Brodie v. Chicago Downs Association, Inc., D/B/A Sportsman's ParkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  4. PNGI Charles Town Gaming, LLC v. ReynoldsWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2011
  5. Donovan v. Grand Victoria Casino & Resort, L.P.Indiana Supreme Court · 2010

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API