United States v. Ackell
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
TORRUELLA, Circuit Judge.
*70 A jury convicted David Ackell of one count of stalking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2261A. He now brings a First Amendment challenge to that statute, in addition to challenging the district court's jury instructions and arguing that insufficient evidence supported his conviction. Ackell's constitutional challenge does not succeed. We discern no error in the district court's jury instructions. And lastly, we hold that sufficient evidence supported Ackell's conviction. We therefore affirm.
I
A
We begin with an overview of the relevant facts. Because this appeal pertains in…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Zadvydas v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- United States v. SalernoSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Haguer v. Committee for Industrial OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. RahimiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2023
- United States v. Ho Ka YungCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- United States v. Brandon Michael FleuryCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2021
- Lewis Alan Dugan v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court · 2019
- United States v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.