Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Connolly, Jr. v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 29, 2015No. 09-0280Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partEmas, J.

I concur in Parts I through IV of the majority opinion. However, I do not agree with the analysis, or the result reached, in Part VI26 and, therefore, dissent from that portion of the majority opinion. Because my analysis of the issue in Part VI is dispositive of this appeal,271 conclude that we must reverse with directions to vacate the judgment and sentence and enter a judgment of acquittal.

A. Introduction

The majority opinion frames the issue in Part VI as follows:

Reclassification of the second degree murder was lawful because the State presented evidence and the jury found that the…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Salinas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  2. Hyde v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  3. State v. MontgomerySupreme Court of Florida · 2010
  4. Smith v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
  5. Daniels v. Florida Dept. of HealthSupreme Court of Florida · 2005

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API