Legal Opinion

Navarro v. Castro

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 27, 2013No. 4D11-4809PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGerber, J.

The defendant appeals from the circuit court’s denial of his motion to set aside the court’s final order of dismissal with prejudice after a settlement. The defendant argues the court erred in finding that it did not have jurisdiction to consider the motion. We agree with the defendant and reverse. We remand for the court to set an evidentiary hearing on the motion.

The parties entered into a stock purchase agreement in which the plaintiff agreed to sell his shares of a business to the defendant. The defendant executed a promissory note in which he agreed to pay for the shares in installments.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Randle-Eastern Ambulance Service v. VastaSupreme Court of Florida · 1978
  2. Miller v. Fortune Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1986
  3. Shampaine Industries, Inc. v. South Broward Hosp. Dist.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  4. River Bridge Corp v. American Somax VenturesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011
  5. Wells Fargo Bank, NA v. HaecherlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cottrell v. Taylor, Bean & Whitaker Mortgage Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2016
  2. Tissier v. TissierDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API