Legal Opinion
Bonneville v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided November 4, 2008No. 36895-1-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, J.
¶1 Robert Bonneville1 appeals a summary judgment in favor of Pierce County (County) on his 42 U.S.C. section 1983 claims against the County and a number of its agents. Bonneville contends that the trial court should have granted his motion to continue the summary judgment hearing so that his recently hired attorney could prepare for it. He also argues that there are issues of material fact as to (1) whether he voluntarily consented to an inspection by county officials during which they learned that Bonneville was violating his conditional use permit to operate a business out of his home and…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Orris v. LingleyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
- Bonneville v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2009
- Bonneville v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
- Bonny M. Bolson v. Hayden G. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Monster v. Creatd IncDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.