United States v. Goldblatt Bros.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Dissent
MAJOR, Circuit Judge.(dissenting).
I disagree with that part of the opinion relative to the 1937 income tax and the 1937 Social Security taxes — Title IX. Insofar as the judgment is predicated upon these two items, I think it should be reversed. In other respects, I approve.
It is important to keep in mind that the plaintiff’s sole right to recover is predicated upon the Bulk Sales Act of Illinois. It so declared in its complaint, and the case was tried and decided on that theory. We, therefore, are not concerned with rights which plaintiff might have had if some other procedure had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Shepard v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1939
- Tameling v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
- Lawndale Sash & Door Co. ex rel. Silverman v. West Side Trust & Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
- Harry B. Smead Co. ex rel. Scandinavian Seed Co. v. J. Oliver Johnson, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
- Stony Island Trust & Savings Bank ex rel. Shea v. Stony Island State Savings BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1926