Yocum v. Rothensies
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Per curiam
A full consideration of this case satisfies us that both the issues involved were correctly decided by the court below. The opinion of Judge Kirkpatrick (In re Hoffman [D.C.] 16 F.Supp. 391), sets forth a satisfactory statement of the principles involved. We need only add that section 64a of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (11 U. S.C.A. § 104(a), which authorizes the Bankruptcy Court to determine any question arising as to the amount, or’legality of a tax due and owing by the bankrupt, does not confer authority upon the court to waive the requirement of the Revenue Act (26 U.S.C.A. § 23 (k)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- In Re HoffmanDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baumann v. SheehanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1944
- Hadley Falls Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1938
- Bair v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1937
- Corona v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
- Supplee v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1941