Legal Opinion

O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided March 23, 1934PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pound, Ch. J.

This is an action on a policy of marine insurance. The policy consists of a printed form with a rider composed of three typewritten pages, containing twenty-six paragraphs. It is provided that “ the terms and conditions of this form [the typewritten rider] are to be regarded as substituted for those of the policy to which they are attached, when they conflict.” This raises the questions (a) was there a contract of insurance between the plaintiffs and the insurance company; (b) if so, what was that contract? “ The difficulty in answering * * * arises out of the practice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Duncan v. China Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Atlantic Basin Iron Works v. American InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1929

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States Fire Insurance Co. v. Gulf States Marine & Mining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1959
  2. Herald Nathan Press, Inc. v. BourgesCity of New York Municipal Court · 1936
  3. Lowery v. Connecticut Fire Ins. Co. of HartfordCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  4. American Powder Co. v. Commonwealth InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1937
  5. O'Donnell v. Marine Transit Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API