Legal Opinion

Young v. Dunlap

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 30, 1916PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jackson Circuit Court. — Hon. Frank E. Johnson, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtEllison, P. J.

Plaintiff’s action was instituted to recover damages for personal injury received in a collision between an automobile being driven by ber husband and one being driven by defendant. She recovered judgment in the circuit court.

Defendant’s first objection to the judgment is that the verdict upon which it was rendered is not supported by the evidence in the case. In passing upon that question we need only examine the evidence given in plaintiff’s behalf, together with the physical facts disclosed.

That a collision occurred, at eleven o’clock at night, between the two machines at the intersection…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baustian v. YoungSupreme Court of Missouri · 1899
  2. Brown v. PattersonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Marshall v. BuggSupreme Court of Missouri · 1909
  4. Scrivner v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Patrick v. The Steamboat J. Q. AdamsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1853

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. McGeeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1935
  2. Berkovitz v. American River Gravel Co.California Supreme Court · 1923
  3. State Ex Rel. State Highway Commission v. EilersSupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
  4. Dell'Aria v. BonfaSupreme Court of Missouri · 1957
  5. Haven v. SnyderIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API