Legal Opinion

Steep v. Harpham

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 14, 1928No. Docket No. 87PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFellows, J.

Plaintiff brings this action to recover on the following note:

“$1,661.00. February 14, 1925.
“One year after date, I promise to pay to the order of Miss May Steep, one thousand six hundred sixty-one and 00/100 dollars at 6 per cent, per annum.
“Value received.
“No.............. Due..................
“Ona Harpham.” .

Defendant filed an affidavit denying the execution of the note and gave notice under her plea of the general issue of the defense of want of consideration. As the important question in the case is whether the court should have directed a verdict for the defendant at the close of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Manistee National Bank v. SeymourMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Cawthorpe v. ClarkMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Rood v. JonesMichigan Supreme Court · 1843
  4. Taylor v. WeeksMichigan Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Matter of Cliff's Ridge Skiing Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
  2. Levitz v. Capitol Savings & Loan Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Sacred Heart Aid Society v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Smith v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. KuhnNebraska Supreme Court · 1933

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API