Legal Opinion

Anderson v. St. Rose of Lima's Roman Catholic Church

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 15, 1933PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment reversed on the law and the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to appellant to abide the event, upon the ground that the plaintiff’s proof presented a question of fact. The building code specifically includes churches within its provisions (Art. 4, § 70, subd. 2). The provisions of that code as to the requirements of interior stairways (Art. 8, § 153) are made applicable to exterior stairways (§ 154). Subdivisions 4 and 6 of section 153 (supra), setting forth the requirements of treads and risers and handrails, may be found upon the record before us to have been violated.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Willy v. . MulledyNew York Court of Appeals · 1879

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Reische v. MontgomeryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  2. Anderson v. St. Rose of Lima's Roman Catholic ChurchAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API