Kaye v. the State

McFADDEN, Presiding Judge.

James Kaye was tried before a jury and convicted of multiple offenses arising out of a home invasion robbery Kaye appeals, challenging the denial of a motion to suppress the statement he gave to police and the effectiveness of his trial counsel. However, the denial of the motion to suppress was not erroneous, and trial counsel’s performance was not both deficient and prejudicial. Accordingly, we affirm.

1. Facts and procedural posture.

“On appeal from a criminal conviction, we view the evidence in the light most favorable to the verdict, with the defendant no longer…