Legal Opinion

United States v. Sam Gentry, Wayne Young, William Hadley, Carolyn Dalton and Walter Nichols

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 5, 1988No. 87-3102PublishedCited by 23 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEE, Circuit Judge:

Defendants Nichols, Dalton, Gentry and Hadley appeal their conviction of knowingly and intentionally conspiring to possess marijuana with intent to distribute it. Defendant Young appeals his broader conviction for activity related to the same drug transaction. For the reasons stated, we affirm the conviction of each.

Facts

As with many conspiracy appeals, we are obliged to commence with a lengthy recitation of the facts. One of his relatives having nearly died from cocaine abuse, David Ard decided to straighten himself out. He pledged to terminate his own abusive use of the…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Kotteakos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. United States v. Armando Correa-VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  2. State v. FisherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  3. United States v. Jesus TamariCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2006
  4. United States v. Felipe Molina-UribeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988
  5. United States v. BradfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API