Legal Opinion

In re Proctor

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 9, 1957No. 43188PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

LINDBERG, District Judge.

The only issue presented for decision upon the petition for review herein is whether or not a certain contract between A1 Schlaitzer and bankrupt purporting to be a conditional sales contract covering a meat market, being Trustee’s Exhibit No. 2, is under the laws of the State of Washington a conditional sales contract or a chattel mortgage.

The matter is submitted on a stipulated summary of evidence containing but two brief paragraphs as follows:

“I.
“Laird B. Peterson testified that he is the duly appointed, qualified and acting trustee of Freeman Arthur Proctor,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. West American Finance Co. v. FinstadWashington Supreme Court · 1928
  2. Low v. ColbyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Seaboard Securities Co., Inc. v. BergWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Allis-Chalmers Manufacturing Co. v. Hedlund Lumber & Manufacturing Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Investment Service Co. v. LaLondeWashington Supreme Court · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API