I. & G. N. R'y Co. v. Hassell
Texas Supreme Court
Appeal from Anderson. Tried below before the Hon. Peyton Edwards.
1Opinion of the Court
Stayton, Associate Justice.
In so far as it was necessary to do so, the charge of the court below clearly informed the jury as to the rights of the respective parties on each ground of action embraced in the petition.
One ground of action was the failure of the appellant to carry the appellee from Jacksonville to Elkhart on the train on which he started from the former place.
The other ground of action was that the conductor ejected the appellee from the train on which he left Jacksonville, in an improper manner, from which he alleged injury.
Hnder the uncontroverted facts presented by the record…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Kline v. Cent. Pac. R.R.California Supreme Court · 1869
3Cited by13 opinions
- Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. CampbellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1902
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. GaddieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1915
- St. Louis Southwestern Railway Co. v. WallaceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1903
- Cluck v. Houston & Texas Central RailroadCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1907
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.