Legal Opinion

(PC) Anderson v. Kernan

District Court, E.D. California

Decided October 23, 2019No. 1:19-cv-01048Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HECTOR CLARENCE ANDERSON, 1:19-cv-01048-LJO-SKO (PC) 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 14 SCOTT KERNAN, et al., (Doc. 16) 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff Hector Clarence Anderson is a prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 20 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 7, 2019, Plaintiff filed a motion seeking the 21 appointment of counsel. (Doc. 16.) Plaintiffs do not have a constitutional right to appointed 22 counsel in section 1983 actions, Rand v. Rowland,

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Mallard v. United States Dist. Court for Southern Dist. of IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Lee A. Rand v. James Rowland Nadim Khoury, M.D. William Bunnell Roy Lee Johnson Leo R. EstesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API