(PC) Arellano v. CAL PIA
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 BOBBY ARELLANO, No. 1:23-cv-01202-KES-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING 13 v. ACTION FOR FAILURE TO STATE A COGNIZABLE CLAIM FOR RELIEF 14 CAL. PIA, et al. Doc. 12 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this action filed pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 19 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On December 18, 2023, the assigned magistrate judge…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Farmer v. BrennanSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Nick Mangiaracina v. Paul PenzoneCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017