Legal Opinion

Rome Urban Renewal Agency v. Schneible

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1970PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtJ. Robert Lynch, J.

The appearing defendants, whose properties have been condemned by the plaintiff, have served a demand that the plaintiff’s director produce at his examination before trial all appraisals of their properties made by or on behalf of the plaintiff. The plaintiff moves now for an order protecting it against such a disclosure. The parties have agreed that the demand for production is not intended to include those appraisals that will actually be used by the plaintiff on the trials since these will be produced in any event under the special rule of the Appellate Division, Fourth Department relating…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. City of Buffalo v. IvesNew York Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Burke v. YudelsonNew York Supreme Court · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API