Legal Opinion

Berlin Machine Works v. Miller

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1910No. 8652PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal .from a judgment of the superior court for Lewis county, Rice, J., entered. August 3, 1909, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, ip an action on contract.

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant delivered to the respondents two certain machines; namely, a self-feed ripsaw and a band resaw, under the following contract of sale and guaranty :

Chehalis, Sept. 4th, 1905.

Berlin Machine Works.

Main Office and Works: Beloit, Wisconsin.

Subject to strikes, accidents or other delays beyond your con* trol, please ship in good order the following Machinery, delivered F. O. B., Beloit, Wisconsin, about 1 week:

One latest improved ‘Pilot Wheel Set Works’ band resaw, No, 285, 64" 8" saw — Right hand with double roller bed as per explanations attached. Furnish one saw filed and fitted.

One…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Buckeye Buggy Co. v. Montana Stables, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Aylmore v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1907

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McCollough v. Cashmere School District No. 222Court of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  2. Detroit Vapor Stove Co. v. J. C. Weeter Lumber Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Creel v. NettletonWashington Supreme Court · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API