Legal Opinion
Physicians' Reciprocal Insurers v. Jordan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 8, 2007PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff is not obligated to defend or indemnify the defendant in the underlying medical malpractice actions entitled Dominguez v Ross, Celemen v Jordan, and Montalvo v LaserOne, commenced in the Supreme Court, New York County, under index Nos. 102902/03, 122495/02, and 117173/04, respectively, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Cozzens, J.), entered October 25, 2005, which upon granting the plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring that it is not obligated to defend or indemnify him in the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Zuckerman v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
- Breed v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Government Employees Insurance v. KliglerNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Garvin v. RosenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Caporino v. Travelers InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Ambra v. AwadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009