Legal Opinion

United States Ex Rel. Chovanec v. Apria Healthcare Group Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided May 19, 2010No. 06-1619PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge.

The district court dismissed this qui tam action under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(5), which provides: “When a person brings an action under this subsection, no person other than the Government may intervene or bring a related action based on the facts underlying the pending action.” The complaint accuses Apria Healthcare of fraudulently billing the Medicare and Medicaid programs for medical devices (such as oxygen tanks) and related services that were unnecessary or should have been recorded under less expensive reimbursement codes. According to the complaint, the fraud took…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Jones v. BockSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. McNeil v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Rockwell International Corp. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Hallstrom v. Tillamook CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  5. Graham County Soil & Water Conservation District v. United States Ex Rel. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. United States Ex Rel. Gadbois v. PharMerica Corp.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
  2. United States ex rel. Heath v. AT & T, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
  3. United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2017
  4. United States ex rel. Wood v. Allergan, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2018
  5. United States ex rel. Carter v. Halliburton Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2013

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API