Legal Opinion

Ryan Landry, Plaintiff v. Thomson Reuters Corporation, Defendant

District Court, D. New Hampshire

Decided September 24, 2018No. 16-cv-507-SMPublished

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW HAMPSHIRE Ryan Landry, Plaintiff v. Case No. 16-cv-507-SM Opinion No.

2018 DNH 194

Thomson Reuters Corporation, Defendant O R D E R Plaintiff, Ryan Landry, filed this proposed class action against his former employer, Time Warner Cable, as well as Thomson Reuters Corporation. Landry alleged that Time Warner violated various provisions of the federal Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”), as well as New Hampshire’s statutory analogue. He also claimed Time Warner wrongfully terminated his employment and, in so doing, violated New Hampshire’s Whistleblower…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2016
  3. Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. Public Citizen v. United States Department of JusticeSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Epic Systems Corp. v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 2018

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API