Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

In re Town of Hempstead

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 13, 1981Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partLazer, J.

with the following memorandum: I must respectfully voice my dissent from my colleagues’ refusal to modify their order reversing Special Term’s order and remanding for a new trial dealing with the reproduction value of the beach club improvements. The *543order now sought to be modified concluded, in essence, that the Malibu property should be treated as a specialty even though Malibu did not claim it was a specialty and the property clearly did not meet the standards required for such treatment (see Matter of County of Nassau [Colony Beach Club of Lido], 43 AD2d 45, affd 39 NY2d 958). But if…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re the County of NassauAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1973
  2. In re the County of NassauNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. City of New York v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API