Legal Opinion

Jucino v. Commerce Insurance

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided December 23, 2011Published

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

The defendant, Commerce Insurance Company (“Commerce”), has appealed the judgments entered for the plaintiffs, Jahaira Jucino (“Jucino”) and Isabel Cintron (“Cintron”), on their claims under G.L.C. 176D and G.L.c. 93A arising from Commerce’s alleged unreasonable investigation of their claims for Personal Injury Protection (“PIP”) benefits for chiropractic services.

*286We summarize the trial judge’s findings and the uncontested facts of record.3 Millenium Equity Holdings, LLC v. Mahlowitz, 456 Mass. 627, 630 (2010); Northshore Chiropractic v. Commerce Ins. Co., 2010 Mass. App. Div. 168. Jucino…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Linthicum v. ArchambaultMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Heller v. Silverbranch Construction Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
  3. Fontaine v. Ebtec Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1993
  4. Aspinall v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  5. Clegg v. ButlerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1997

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API