Legal Opinion

Eastman Kodak Co. v. South Carolina Tax Commission

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided May 26, 1992No. 23606PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chandler, Justice:

We granted rehearing to reconsider our decision reported at Op. No. 23606 (S.C. filed March 30, 1992) Davis Adv. Sh. No. 9 at 12). The original opinion is withdrawn, and this amended opinion is substituted.

Kodak appeals an Order affirming the Tax Commission’s denial of deductions derived from transactions known as “safe harbor leases.”

We reverse.

FACTS

Kodak is a multinational corporation doing business in South Carolina. In computing its 1985 South Carolina income tax, Kodak used an apportionment formula whereby its sales, payroll, and property in South Carolina were divided…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Covington Fabrics Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  3. National Service Industries, Inc. v. PowersCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1990
  4. Exxon Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1979
  5. M. Lowenstein Corp. v. South Carolina Tax CommissionCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1989

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Directv, Inc. v. S.C. Dep't of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2017
  2. Rent-A-Center West Inc. v. South Carolina Department of RevenueCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API