Legal Opinion
IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided October 7, 2025No. 0:18-cv-01776Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA IN RE PORK ANTITRUST LITIGATION Civil No. 18-1776 (JRT/JFD) OPINION AND ORDER ON MOTION FOR This Document Relates To: RECUSAL AND VACATUR ALL ACTIONS Defendants Agri Stats, Inc., Clemens Family Corporation, Clemens Food Group, LLC, Seaboard Foods, LLC, Smithfield Foods, Inc., Triumph Foods, LLC, Tyson Foods, Inc., Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc., and Tyson Prepared Foods, Inc. filed a Motion to Recuse and for Vacatur of Daubert and Summary Judgment Rulings. Defendants’ motion is based on the contention that one of the Court’s law clerks exhibited…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Liljeberg v. Health Services Acquisition Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Caperton v. A. T. Massey Coal Co., Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Stanley D. Rabushka, Ex Rel. United States of America Stanley D. Rabushka v. Crane CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1997
- In Re Corrugated Container Antitrust Litigation. Steering CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.