Legal Opinion

Robert Burgess & Son v. Alcorn

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided May 11, 1907No. 15,025PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error from Jewell district court; Richard M. Pick-ler, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

MASON, J.:

Robert and Charles Burgess prosecute error from a judgment for $1254 rendered in an action brought against them by Wiley Alcorn and several others. The plaintiffs in their petition alleged that they had bought a stallion of the defendants, receiving a written warranty of its qualities, and executing in payment three promissory notes for $400 each; that one provision of the contract was that under certain conditions this stallion might be returned and another would be supplied in its stead, which should meet the requirements of the warranty;…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Comstock v. . HierNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  2. Decker v. . MathewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1855
  3. Fahey v. Esterley Machine Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Thayer v. . ManleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Farnham v. . BenedictNew York Court of Appeals · 1887

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseUtah Supreme Court · 1913
  2. State v. HartfieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1989
  3. Delaney v. Great Bend Implement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1908
  4. State v. KellySupreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. StoneSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API