In re Estate of Henne
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLocher, J.
Appellants assert three interrelated propositions of law, which, for purposes of discussion herein, shall be consolidated.
Appellants contend, in essence, that, since R. C. 2113.05 vests the Probate Court with discretion to determine the suitability of a named executor, the appellee should be denied the appointment, because the Probate Court determined that hostility exists between the parties and because the appellee is executrix and primary beneficiary of a will currently in dispute, which will affect her suitability as executrix in this estate.
Stated otherwise, the issue’s central theme is…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Steinberg v. Central Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1969
- In Re Estate of YoungOhio Court of Appeals · 1964
- Allison v. AllisonOhio Supreme Court · 1968
- In Re Estate of NagleOhio Court of Appeals · 1974
- In re Estate of BowmanOhio Court of Appeals · 1957
3Cited by15 opinions
- In Re Estate of PfahlerOhio Court of Appeals · 1989
- In Re Estate of UsiakOhio Court of Appeals · 2007
- Gockel v. EbleOhio Court of Appeals · 1994
- In re Estate of JenkinsOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- Estate of Brewer v. BlackOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.