Legal Opinion
Workman v. Sundquist
District Court, M.D. Tennessee
Decided March 29, 2001No. 3:01-0295PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CAMPBELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is a Motion For Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 3) and Memorandum In Support Of Motion For Temporary Restraining Order (Docket No. 4). For the reasons stated herein, the Motion is DENIED.
I. CLAIMS
Plaintiff Philip Ray Workman has filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, as well as other authorities (Complaint, at ¶ 5 (Docket No. 1)).
Workman argues that the Court should grant his Motion for a Temporary Restraining Order (TRO) to stay his execution pending completion of an investigation by the Inter-American Commission on…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Michigan State Afl-Cio v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Bin LadenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2001
- Jamison v. CollinsDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2000
- Faulder v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Faulder v. JohnsonDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State of Tennessee v. Richard Odom, a/k/a Otis SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- McCall v. National Health Corp.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2003
- Thompson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2004
- Thompson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 2004