Legal Opinion
Baur v. Amrhein
New York Supreme Court
Decided January 28, 1988PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
William L. Underwood, Jr., J.
The novel issue presented in this action is whether or not *927the Statute of Limitations should be held to apply to the Suffolk County Department of Social Services. If the statute applies and it has expired, the Department will be unable to seek reimbursement for the public money that it expended for the support of a recipient of public assistance.
Plaintiff brings this action to cancel and discharge a certain mortgage (RPAPL art 15) upon the ground that payment of the mortgage is barred by the Statute of Limitations and now moves for summary…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. City of BinghamtonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
- Commissioner of Welfare v. JonesNew York City Family Court · 1973
- City of Buffalo v. MaggioAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
- Mores v. FeelNew York City Family Court · 1973
- Lydia L v. Vidal LNew York City Family Court · 1978
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Gower v. WeinbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- New York City Transit Authority v. New York Historical SocietyNew York Supreme Court · 1995
- Saliani v. AmrheinNew York Supreme Court · 1988