Taylor v. Burgus
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtAlbert, J.
Under the contention of the defendant there is but one question for decision in this case.
The defendant made a motion to direct a verdict, at the close of all the testimony, which was overruled, and, to the action of the court in overruling this motion for a directed verdict, the defendant excepted. The correctness of this ruling is the only question raised in the case. It is suggested, however, that the defendant, not having'filed a motion for a new trial, cannot be heard on the question he now raises.
The general rule governing motions for new trial, as set out in Stewart v. Equitable Mut.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Stewart v. Equitable Mutual Life Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- First Presbyterian Church v. DennisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
- Landis v. Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
- McCarl v. Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
- Owens v. Norwood-White Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1917
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Olson v. HodgesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1945
- Johnson v. ScottSupreme Court of Iowa · 1966
- Floy v. HibbardSupreme Court of Iowa · 1939
- McCornack v. PickrellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1942
- Jahn Patric Kirlin and Sara Louise Kirlin v. Dr. Barclay A. Monaster, M.D.; Dr. Christian William Jones, M.D.; and Physicians Clinic d/b/a Methodist Physicians Clinic-Council BluffsSupreme Court of Iowa · 2025