Legal Opinion
Cangro v. Rosado
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided November 15, 2011PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Supreme Court properly confirmed the Special Referee’s report since the Referee’s findings were supported by the record and there is no basis on this record to set aside his findings (see Flanagan & Cooke v RC 27th Ave. Realty Corp., 305 AD2d 135 [2003]). Supreme Court also properly awarded respondent Rosado commissions for her work as appellant’s guardian, as the record contains no evidence of wrongdoing (see SCPA 2307; Matter of Ellman, 7 AD3d 423 [2004]). The court properly exercised its discretion in awarding a fee to Rosado for extraordinary services in light of the significant time and…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- MTR. OF STORTECKY v. MazzoneNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- In re KennyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- RC 27th Avenue Realty Corp. v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- In re RosadoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by7 opinions
- Matter of Ruth S. (Sharon S.)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Sunrise Nursing Home, Inc. v. FerrisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Frank C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- In re Frank C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Matter of Ruth S. (Stein)Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.