Henson v. Prue
District of Columbia Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SCHWELB, Associate Judge:
Following a bench trial, the trial court ruled that the defendant, Clarence Prue, had wrongfully evicted Gregory Henson by changing the locks to a house at which Henson had rented a room. Declaring that she did not believe Henson’s testimony, however, the trial judge assessed Prue’s damages at zero. Henson appeals; we conclude that, in light of the trial judge’s findings, the judge could permissibly hold that Henson was entitled only to nominal damages. Because a remand for the award of nominal damages would serve no useful purpose, we affirm.
I
According to his…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Robinson v. SariskyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1988
- United Insurance Co. of America v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Reese v. HaywoodSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1962
- Kraisinger v. LiggettCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- Harkins v. Win Corp.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Wood v. NeumanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
- Hinton v. Sealander Brokerage Co.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2007
- Zoerb v. Barton Protective ServicesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2004
- D.G. II, LLC v. NixCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011
- Mario Segreti v. Luke DeIuliisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.