Legal Opinion
Erhart v. Bofi Holding Inc.
District Court, S.D. California
Decided January 13, 2022No. 3:15-cv-02287Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHARLES MATTHEW ERHART, Case No. 15-cv-02287-BAS-NLS 11 consolidated with Plaintiff, 15-cv-02353-BAS-NLS 12 ORDER GRANTING IN PART 13 v. MOTION IN LIMINE NO. 5 TO 14 BOFI HOLDING, INC., EXCLUDE EVIDENCE OF ANY DAMAGES THAT REQUIRE 15 Defendant. COMPUTATION (ECF No. 221) 16 And Consolidated Case 17 18 19 Presently before the Court is BofI Holding, Inc. (“BofI” or “Bank”)’s Motion 20 in Limine No. 5 to Exclude Evidence of Any Damages that Require Computation. 21 (Mot., ECF No. 221.) Charles Matthew Erhart opposes.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Yeti by Molly Ltd. v. Deckers Outdoor Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- R & R Sails, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of PennsylvaniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Design Strategy, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Hoffman v. Construction Protective Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Williams v. Trader Publishing Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.