Frank Ortegon v. State

OPINION

Evelyn V. Keyes, Justice

A jury convicted appellant, Frank Or-tegon, of the first-degree felony offense of aggravated robbery and, after appellant pleaded true to the allegations in two enhancement paragraphs, assessed his punishment at forty years’ confinement. 1 In one issue, appellant contends that the trial court improperly required him to pay restitution to the complainant because the jury did not specify restitution as part of his sentence in its punishment verdict. Appellant requests that this Court modify his judgment of conviction to delete the restitution requirement.

We affirm.