Legal Opinion

People v. Alicea

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Steuer, J. P.

The able and painstaking dissent requires some explanation of how the majority could reach the conclusion to affirm. It has long been recognized that no trial is entirely free from error and it is only such error as precludes a proper determination that mandates a new trial (see CPL 470.05, subd. .1). We neither condone nor excuse the conduct of the Assistant District Attorney who conducted the prosecution and share the feeling of outrage that is implicit in. the dissent. Notwithstanding this visceral reaction, we do not believe that the totality of incidents, including those not…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LowranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  2. Alicea v. KuhlmanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1982
  3. People v. CarterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. People v. VargasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  5. People v. LowranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API