Legal Opinion

Reid v. Bristol

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1955No. 236PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBobbitt, J.

As indicated above, this appeal does not concern the status of the judgment of 9 October, 1936, in favor of the late P. M. Reid and against Mabel L. Bristol. However, upon the record before us, it would appear that the lien thereof on real property, if any, has ceased to exist, G.S. 1-234, Lupton v. Edmundson, 220 N.C. 188, 16 S.E. 2d 840; and, further, that the time for the issuance of execution thereon to enforce payment has expired. G.S. 1-306.

Under former statutory provisions, last codified as sections 667 and 668 of the Consolidated Statutes of 1919 (superseded by G.S. 1-306), the life…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. McDonald v. . DicksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  2. State ex rel. Hanson v. YandleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Lewis v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Dunlap v. . HendleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Barnes v. . FortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Teele v. KerrSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  2. Cunningham v. BrigmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Raccoon Valley Investment Co. v. TolerCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1977
  4. United States v. EstesDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1978
  5. Estate of Thompson v. TurnerIdaho Supreme Court · 1984

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API