Legal Opinion

Ragland v. Forsythe

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 12, 1984No. 83-261PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

P. A. Hollingsworth, Justice.

The appellee, William V. Forsythe, a Tennessee resident, was denied a music machine operator’s permit because he did not meet the residency requirements of Ark. Stat.. Ann. § 84-2634 (b) (Repl. 1980). He filed suit against the Department of Finance & Administration claiming that the statute was unconstitutional as applied to nonresidents. The trial court found that the statutory requirement of a one year Arkansas residency is unconstitutional. On appeal we affirm.

Ark. Stat. Ann. § 84-2633 (Repl. 1980) provides that:

The business of owning, operating or leasing coin…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Austin v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Wometco Services, Inc. v. GaddySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
  3. Brown v. CheneySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1961
  4. Jacks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1951

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Pickaway County Skilled Gaming, L.L.C. v. CordrayOhio Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API