Legal Opinion
Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Co. v. Herron
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided January 23, 1978No. 75-1538PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KENNEDY, Circuit Judge:
Respondent Herron was injured in the course of his employment with Brady-Hamilton Stevedore Company (Brady-Hamilton). The accident occurred at Brady-Hamilton’s facility at the Port of Longview, Washington. Herron filed a claim under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (Act), 33 U.S.C. § 901 et seq. (1970 & Supp. V 1975). Brady-Hamilton contested the claim, alleging that Herron’s injury was not covered by the Act. The administrative law judge held that the Act did cover Herron’s injury and awarded compensation. The Benefits Review Board (Board)…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Northeast Marine Terminal Co. v. CaputoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Victory Carriers, Inc. v. LawSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Detroit Trust Co. v. the Thomas BarlumSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Nacirema Operating Co. v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- New Orleans Depot Services, Inc. v. Director, Office of Worker's Compensation ProgramsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2013
- Texports Stevedore Co. v. WinchesterCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Valladolid v. Pacific Operations Offshore, LLPCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Harry Hurston v. Director, Office of Workers Compensation Programs McGray Construction Company Beaver Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Perkins v. Marine Terminals Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.