Legal Opinion

Fields v. Dinkins

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided July 14, 1910No. Gen. No. 14,739Published

Assumpsit. Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Habby Olson, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Freeman

This is an action for alleged breach of contract. At the conclusion of all the evidence the Municipal Court on motion directed a verdict for defendant and gave judgment against plaintiffs for costs. Plaintiffs seek to reyerse this judgment.

The agreement in question is dated April 10th, 1906, and was made and entered into “by and between T. W. Dinkins, Theatrical Manager, of the City, County and State,of New York, party of the first part, and. Fields & Fields, actor or actress, of the second part.” By its first 'danse the second party, plaintiffs herein, contracted to render services to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kendall v. WestIllinois Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Temby v. William Brunt Pottery Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1907
  3. International Harvester Co. of America v. BoatmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1905
  4. Kendall v. WestAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API