State v. Clemons
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Marion District Court. — Hon. A. W. Wilkinson, Judge. Defendant was indicted and convicted of seduction. He now appeals to this court.
1Opinion of the CourtBeck, J.
1- evidence0as"to child born. I. The prosecuting witness was permitted to testify, against defendant’s objection, that after the alleged seduction she gave birth to a child, and to state the date of such birth, gjle a;iso testified that the child she had with her was the child. The facts of the birth of a child, and the date of such birth, were matters connected with the alleged seduction proper to be shown in support of prosecutrix’ testimony that she had sexual intercourse, and the time thereof. This evidence does not connect defendant with the crime, and does not, therefore, corroborate…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Rayburn v. Central Iowa Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1887
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. LaMarSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
- People v. . KearneyNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
- De Wulf v. DixSupreme Court of Iowa · 1900
- Ricker v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- State v. WilcoxenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.