D.D. v. State
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NAJAM, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
D.D., a juvenile, appeals from the juvenile court's order which adjudicated him a delinquent child based upon his commission of two acts which would be crimes if committed by an adult: Possession of Cocaine, a Class D felony, and Resisting Law Enforcement, a Class A misdemeanor. The sole issue presented for our review is whether the court erred when it denied D.D.'s motion to suppress evidence of cocaine seized during a warrantless search of his person.
We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand with instructions.
FACTS
On June 21, 1995, during a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chimel v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Adams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Michigan v. LongSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Burkett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
- Williams v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- Burkett v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
- Pinkney v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2001
- J.D. v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.