Matter of Barr v. Dep't of Consumer Affairs of the City of New York
New York Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, with costs, and the determination of the Department of Consumer Affairs reinstated.
After a hearing, petitioner, a licensed process server since 1971, was found guilty of failing to comply with the rules and regulations of the licensing agency, the Department of Consumer Affairs. Specifically, petitioner was found guilty of several counts of failing to keep records in the form mandated by law because of his maintenance of illegible records, his omission of necessary information about process served and his…
2Cited by13 opinions
- Kleeman v. RheingoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Hobbins v. North Star Orthopedics, PLLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Landmark Capital Investments, Inc. v. WangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Norwood Pub, Inc. v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- D'Ambra v. HaynorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.