Legal Opinion

State v. Orozco

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided March 17, 2008No. 59064-2-IPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1 — Christina Orozco appeals her conviction for stalking. She argues that the trial court erred by refusing to disqualify the Snohomish County Prosecutor’s Office (Prosecutor’s Office) because one of its attorneys assisted her victim in obtaining a civil antiharassment order. She fails to properly raise any relevant Washington rule, statute, or case to support her claim that a prosecutor’s office cannot assist a county employee in obtaining a civil antiharassment order against another county employee and then later prosecute the offending employee criminally without creating an…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Berger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  3. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Marshall v. Jerrico, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Of Washington v. James Lee O'neil, Jr.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2017
  2. State v. OrozcoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  3. R.o. And K.m. v. Medalist Holdings LlcCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021
  4. State Of Washington v. Christopher Lynn SpanjerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2026
  5. State Of Washington, V Robert Glen CarpenterCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API