Legal Opinion

DuPont v. Commissioner

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided May 29, 1933No. 791PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Caedozo

This case, like Burnet v. Wells, decided today, ante, p. 670, requires us to determine whether § 219 (h) of the Revenue Acts of 1924 and 1926 is consistent with the Fifth Amendment in its application to trusts for the payment of premiums on policies of insurance.

On September 18,1923, the petitioner, Du Pont, created nine trusts for the benefit of his, wife and children, transferring to the trustee thereby two policies of insurance on his life, and shares of stock in a corporation, the income to be used to keep the policies in force. The trusts were to last for three years, during which term…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Dahnke-Walker Milling Co. v. BondurantSupreme Court of the United States · 1921

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. Helvering v. CliffordSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  3. Louis Sager Hunsucker, Jr. v. Robert L. Phinney, District Director of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1974
  4. Mallinckrodt v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1943
  5. Bassett v. CommissionerUnited States Board of Tax Appeals · 1935

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API