People v. Dat Tan Nguyen
California Court of Appeal
[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MIHARA, J.
Defendant was convicted of petty theft with a prior (Pen. Code, § 666), and allegations that he had suffered two prior serious or violent felony convictions within the meaning of Penal Code section 667, subdivisions (b) to (i) were found true. He was committed to state prison for an indeterminate term of 25 years to life. On appeal, he asserts that (1) CALJIC No. 2.90 is inadequate because it does not define “abiding conviction,” (2) the trial court prejudicially erred in giving CALJIC No. 17.42, (3) the trial court abused its discretion by refusing to reduce the conviction…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. Superior Court (Romero)California Supreme Court · 1996
- People v. Eric J.California Supreme Court · 1979
- People v. OlivasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. CoronadoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- People v. HofsheierCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- People v. GonzalesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. NoyanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
- Nichols, Wool v. HofmannSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
- People v. LoveCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.