Legal Opinion

Dukes v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 11, 1994No. 93-03159PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

Clarence Edward Dukes appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction *105relief. Of the numerous grounds presented in the motion, all but one are clearly -without merit and the circuit court properly denied relief as to those. We remand for further proceedings regarding one claim of ineffective assistance of counsel.

Dukes alleges that his trial attorney “refused” to allow him to take the stand and threatened to walk out if Dukes insisted upon testifying. The circuit court’s order finds that Dukes “could have brought his concerns to the attention of the court.” Although the court’s…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Donald TeagueCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1992
  2. Gill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Cutter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mims v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  2. Kersey v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API